Pintop
Pintop Theoretical Margins
Theoretical Profit
Muffin Free
Earnings: $102,846.60
Muffin Cut: $51,423.30
Muffin Covers: 51,257 (Subs) x 0.30 (Pintop) = $15,377.10
Muffin Profit: $36,046.20
Agency Cut: $51,423.30
Agency Covers: 51,257 (Subs) x 0.31 (Pintop) = $15,889.67
Chat Costs: $18,512.38
Agency Profit: $17,021.25
Agency Profit Per Sub: $0.33
Client Profit Per Sub: $0.70
Ivy Free
Earnings: $18,695.59
Ivy Cut: $9,347.79
Ivy Covers: 18,166 (Subs) x 0.30 (Pintop) = $5,449.80
Ivy Profit: $3,897.99
Agency Cut: $9,347.79
Agency Covers: 18,166 (Subs) x 0.31 (Pintop) = $5,631.46
Chat Costs: $3,365.20
Agency Profit: $351.13
Agency Profit Per Sub: $0.01
Client Profit Per Sub: $0.21
Sour Free
Earnings: $8,512.51
Sour Cut: $4,256.25
Sour Covers: 9,435 (Subs) x 0.30 (Pintop) = $2,830.50
Sour Profit: $1,425.75
Agency Cut: $4,256.25
Agency Covers: 9,435 (Subs) x 0.31 (Pintop) = $2,924.85
Chat Costs: $1,532.25
Agency Profit: -$200.85
Agency Profit Per Sub: -$0.02
Client Profit Per Sub: $0.15
Results
How can we fix this?
Suggestion to have clients on a 60/40 percentage split
Client pays $0.30 per sub
Agency pays $0.31 per sub + Chat Costs
If we were to do this the following results would be true ↓
Muffin Free
Ivy Free
Sour Free
This structure keeps take-home profits relatively balanced across all three accounts while giving the agency a modest cushion for the additional operational responsibility and financial risk associated with chatting costs.